02 October 2015

Tragedy at sea - Charles Swankie




This appears to have become a standard for my blogs, in that I start with a photograph. I feel that it creates a focus for readers whilst reminding me about whom I am writing.

I have many old family photographs dating back to the mid-19th century and one in particular of my great- great grandfather Mathieson with his wife and children which unfortunately met with an accident through my own carelessness. I had been perusing these old images for selection and inclusion in my family story when guests arrived. I quickly gathered up the photographs and bundled them in a drawer. ( I can hear the great cries of ' you bloody idiot' from readers) It was not the putting them into the drawer it was in their retrieval which caused the damage, you can visualise what happened. Luckily one of my talents, apart from destroying photographs is in restoring them.

The photograph above was in a very faded state and had several scratch marks, but a few hours spent restored it to its former glory. The photograph of my great grandmother Scarbrough in a previous story was originally in the same condition prior to restoration and letting my imagination run to show how she may have looked had colour photography been available then.


This image is of my grandfather Peter Swankie, as a young man with his two brothers. Peter is the one on the right. I visualise that they are attending a wedding as they are all dressed in their best suits and ties. It is possible, depending on the date, that it is in fact Peter's wedding, as he appears to be dressed in a frock coat.

I only knew him briefly, as he died when I was nine years old. I will never forget that day as it was the first time I had seen my mother in tears.
It was around 7.30 in the morning that she awoke me for breakfast and to get myself ready for school, but couldn't speak as she seemed so upset. I asked my dad what was wrong, but he told me to leave things just now and he would tell me later.
I set off to school around 8.30 and spent the morning, in class, wondering what was wrong with my mum. As you can imagine, a nine year old has a vivid imagination and as such many scenarios were playing in my head.

It was at first morning break (playtime to the older readers) that I met up with my two cousins Jackie and Peter Swankie and asked them if they had any idea what was wrong. Peter's reply shocked me " fether died last night". My grandad Swankie was dead!
My grandad was, like my grandmother, never known as grandpa or grandad, or pop, he was always 'fether Swankie' as my gran was 'mother Swankie'


According to legend, Peter was a wee bit odd. At family mealtimes he would always set the table. Now that in itself is perfectly normal, but to carry the cutlery from the kitchen one item at a time is a tad strange, and to set his own place at the corner of the table, well that is weird. He was apparently a creature of habit and possibly a bit OCD. When I visited my grandmother in the first house I knew them in Mansion Avenue Port Glasgow, he would always retire to his bed around 8pm, which as a wee boy I found odd, cos grown-ups always stayed up late, didn't they? This continued when they moved home to Kelburn Terrace in 1955 and to be honest I hardly ever saw him. As an impressionable child I think that I felt that feather didn't like me, but according to my mother, that was just his way, as he, since his teenage days, rose early for his work in the bakery and also rose early when he worked in the Newark Sailcloth Company. Mayhap he got this from his father. Who knows what we inherit genetically.

Peter came from Arbroath and was descended from a long line of fishermen from Auchmithie. The name 'Swankie' has its home in Auchmithie, as has the Arbroath smokie. OK hands up all those who have never heard of the Arbroath Smokie

From the Aberdeen Journal, 12th December 1860 :

ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY EIGHT DESCENDANTS - In 1851, when the last census was taken, the population of the fishing village of Auchmithie, the "Musselcrag" of Sir Walter Scott's Antiquary was exactly 300; it is believed to be now about 370. As an instance of the large increase sometimes occurring in individual families, we give the following:- William Swankie, fisher, and Margaret Lawson were married in 1787, about seventy-three years ago. They had a numerous family, ten of whom grew up and married, and seven of them are at present alive. These ten have forty-two children still living, 134 grandchildren, and four great grandchildren; so that the descendants of William Swankie and Margaret Lawson alive at the moment number 187. They are all, with perhaps one exception, living in Auchmithie, or in Arbroath. How many of the 138 grandchildren of the above ten are unmarried we do not know, no doubt more than 100; and, making allowances for contingencies, that number (100) will in a few years be heads of families. Should the same rate of increase occur in their case, the descendants of William Swankie, about a century hence, will number 18,700, or as many as Arbroath at present contains.

I'm a direct descendant of William & Margaret.

Peter was never a fisherman though. He was a ' belt man and oiler' in the Newark Sailcloth Company, Port Glasgow.

He served his apprenticeship as a baker in Arbroath, with the Co-op, but when his time was out they could not employ him as they had more bakers and not enough work for them. Looking for work therefore, he ended up in Port Glasgow working in a mill, why?,  the reason is unclear but he married a wee lassie from Port Glasgow, my granny. Now they both worked in the Newark Sailcloth Company in Ardgowan Street and the story I have been told is that Lizzie, my gran, saw him carrying a pile of baby clothes and asked what he was up to, his reply was “och Lizzie d’ye no know ye’r expectin a bairn?”. They were married Arbroath three days before their first daughter was born. Through my research I have found that Peter was the first ever Swankie to live in Port Glasgow.

Letter to Peter on completion of his apprenticeship
I am glad that he did, because he met Elizabeth Hancock and married her. She became the best granny that anyone could wish for.
Peter had three sisters:

Elizabeth: born 1867; died 1927
Alexina: Born 1869; died 1870
Alexa: born 1871

and two brothers,

William: born 1879; died 1968 
Charles: born 1874
neither of whom became fishermen

Port Glasgow
The origins of Port Glasgow go back to the construction by Sir George Maxwell between 1450 and 1477 of the "New Werke of Finlastoun", which became Newark Castle. At a good anchorage near the castle, a small fishing hamlet known as Newark formed,[1] like other scattered hamlets along the shores of the River Clyde. After 1589 the village of Greenockformed just under 4 miles (6.4 km) to the west of Newark, and gradually became a market town with growing fishing and sea trade, although it had only a jetty in the bay to unload ships. Since seagoing ships could not go further up the Clyde due to sandbanks, the Glasgow merchants such as the Tobacco Lords wanted harbour access, but got into arguments with Greenock over harbour dues and warehouses. They put a bid in for the Easter Greenock estate for a harbour, but were outbid and the lands became the Barony of Cartsburn. They then negotiated with Sir Patrick Maxwell of Newark Estate, and in 1668 he agreed to lease the City of Glasgow 13 acres (5.3 ha) of land to the west of the castle, for payment of 1,300 merks and an annual feu duty of four merks. Construction of piers and breakwaters enclosing the harbour began promptly, and Newport of Glasgow was constituted as a free port.[2][3]
Trade prospered quickly, and by 1710 Newport of  Glasgow had the principal Clyde custom house, initially in Customhouse Lane, then after 1754 in a new building constructed on the west quay of the harbour. Through that century the town became known simply as Port Glasgow. Ships, mostly owned by Glasgow merchant ships, imported tobacco, sugar, rum, cotton and mahogany from the Americas, as well as timber, iron and hemp from the Baltic. These goods were then taken by road to Glasgow, as was market garden produce from farms around Port Glasgow. A change began in 1773 when the Lang Dyke was constructed to deepen the upper river, and ships increasingly went upriver straight to Glasgow. In 1830 the custom house collected £243,349 3s 1d in revenue, but after that income from the port declined, while Greenock has by then its own custom house.[4]
After 1693, the grid-iron street layout which still forms much of the town centre today, was laid out.


As can be seen from this article on Wikipedia, Newark and thus Port Glasgow was also the main import point for timber from America. The Tobacco Lords apparently negotiated with towns and villages the length of the Clyde from the Firth at Ayr up to and across to Dumbarton, but none were prepared to negotiate thus the hamlet of Newark   The timber was unloaded from ships and held in timber ponds until required for shipbuilding and many other uses. To this day, the markers for the extent of these ponds still exist and can be seen whilst driving along the A8(M8) from Greenock to Langbank, a distance of some eight miles.

Own of the most prolific partnerships involved in the timber industry in the 19th century was Carswell Davie, who had, under the auspices of the timber ponds committee, control of a sizeable quantity of the then existing ponds. Like all businesses, they were always keen to expand and take more control of what they saw as their rite.

I have been lucky enough to have obtained a letter from Carswell-Davie to the Pond Controller Committee requesting more access to ponds at Inchgreen. The letter is dated 12 September 1868.



The letter was obtained after reading the first paragraph in a local history book 'Memories and Momentoes of Old Port Glasgow 100 years ago' by J. Craig Osborne ISBN 0-9546591-0-4.

To be totally honest I purchased this entire as it carried a Greenock PM over a 1868 penny red, in very good condition, whilst looking for  a Greenock MC mark, which are quite rare.



Mr John Carswell of Carswell & Davie

That however is just the start of the story as it is not really about Peter, although it gives reason to my quest, I wanted to find out why he was never a fisherman.

Peter's father Charles was born in St. Vigeans, Angus on the 18th July 1843 to Peter Swankie and Margaret Spink. His grandfather was the William Swankie mentioned in the article from the Aberdeen Journal, married to Margaret Lawson.

Through Scotlandspeople (www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk) I found that Charles had died in 1887 and the record entry stated 'drowned at sea'.


Charles record of death is at the bottom of the page and above him is a record for James Carrie. Now under cause of death, both are identical, so what happened? It took me some  judicious manipulation of the Image and purchase of the certificate which led me to work out what the record said "At sea during storm while engaged in haddock fishing with the boat Betsy & Ellen, which left Arbroath on 30th March. Body found in boat on 16th April which was picked up in a derelict condition off the Coquet and towed into North Shields"



As you can see, the certificate of death is an exact copy of the record book.

Once I had managed to work this out, I just had to find out more about the circumstances surrounding his death. I googled his name but could find nothing. I googled drowning at sea Arbroath and was presented with a few promising results. The first of which was an article in the Arbroath Herald regarding the unveiling of a memorial on the harbour commemorating those who lost their lives in 1887.

The image and article are with kind permission of the Arbroath Herald



Taken on one of my visits to Arbroath in 2010

Since I had found this article I wondered if there had been any report printed about the disaster.

I emailed the editor of the Arbroath Herald asking him if by any chance there still existed any reports. He pointed me in the direction of the Arbroath Library local history department who were extremely helpful and provided me with the following report from the Arbroath Herald printed in 1887.


THE ARBROATH FISHING BOAT DISASTER 1887
RECOVERY OF THE BOAT AND TWO BODIES

Taken from The Arbroath Herald with kind permission from Arbroath Library Local History Dept.

Last Saturday afternoon, Captain Patterson, Harbour master, Arbroath received a telegram from Mr Irvin, North Shields, stating that the Arbroath Fishing smack, No. 18, had the same afternoon been towed into North Shields. No. 18 is the Betsy and Ellen, which had been missing since the gale of 31st March, and had on board a crew of six men, James Carrie being skipper. On receiving the telegram, Captain Patterson communicated with Mr Bennet, Solicitor, who has been acting for the families of the unfortunate men, and that gentleman at once telegraphed to North Shields, asking for particulars. He received to the effect that two bodies had been found in the boat, one of them that of an elderly man, and it was at once presumed to be that of James Carrie. Another telegram was subsequently received stating that the boat was then cleared of water, and that no more bodies had been found. On the receipt of the news of the recovery of the boat and two of the bodies, Messrs Alexander Greig, labourer and Charles Smith, John Cargill and Robert Cargill, High Street fishermen, arranged to go to North Shields to identify and bring home the bodies, and they left per train on Saturday afternoon.
The first news of the recovery of the missing boat was brought to North Shields on Saturday morning at 8 o'clock by the steam trawler Duchess, of North Shields belonging to Mr J.T. Davidson, which arrived at the Corporation Fish Quay. The Master, Captain Watson reported that he had passed at sea the screw-line fishing boat Scotia, belonging to Messrs Irving and Partners, North Shields which had in tow the upturned fishing smack. The report that another upturned fishing boat had been picked up in the North Sea during the night – the first one being the Pittenweem boat – caused a great sensation in the town and from an early hour people were on the look out for the Scotia with the derelict in tow. It appears that she was passed by the Tyne fishing fleet early on Saturday morning, and the master of the Duchess offered his services to assist in towing the upturned boat. This offer was refused, as was also the offer from the master of the Blue Bonnet. During the morning, and up to noon, crowds of people were congregated at the New Quay and at the Fish Quay awaiting the arrival of the Scotia. Between twelve and one o'clock she arrived off the harbour, and came slowly towards the fish quay, her progress exciting the keenest interest.
The smack was on her starboard side and only a small part of her keel was visible above the water. One of the masts was floating alongside the sunken craft. The letters 'A H' and figures '18' painted in white were plainly visible. She was towed to the Gut. The Scotia had a most difficult task, for the ebb tide was against her, and she slipped her cable several times, and as a consequence her arrival was considerably delayed. The upturned smack was picked up twelve miles off the Coquet at six o'clock on Friday night.

Shortly before one o'clock on Saturday preparations were made for righting the boat which had lain off the Fish Quay since its arrival about noon.

The operations of the customs officers, river policemen, fishermen and others were watched by an immense crowd of people, who lined the quays and stood on every point of vantage overlooking the river. The preparations necessarily occupied a considerable time. Ropes were made fast to the overturned boat and conveyed on board the line fishing boats The Brothers and the Gleaner. The number of spectators rapidly increased, and as soon as it was observed that that an attempt was to be made to examine the boat, a rush was made for the trawlers and fishing boats lying at the quay, and in a short time every boat was crowded. About two o'clock the boat was got between The Brothers and the Gleaner, the tug Glendale being at the stern, and chains having been fastened to her, she was righted by means of ropes there being many willing hands to assist. As soon as the boat had been turned over bailing operations commenced, and ultimately a pump was got to work. Shortly after the pumping commenced, the body of a man was seen, and about four o'clock another body was observed. The first of these was taken out and proved to be the body of an elderly man, fully dressed, having on, oilskin coat, sea boots and gloves. The body was at once removed to the mortuary at the Low Lights, by the river police.

Another body, dressed in similar manner was found soon after, and was also conveyed to the dead house. A large crowd followed the remains to the mortuary, and as soon as the doors were closed, the people rushed back to the fish quay. The water was got out by about five o'clock, when a thorough search was made, but no other bodies were discovered.
On Monday morning, Mr Bennet received from Mr John Coull, ship-broker, Shields, formerly of Arbroath, a letter written on Saturday giving particulars of the recovery of the boat. Mr Coull writes:-
As an Arbroath man no apology is required for my writing you this afternoon, and writing to you now relative to the arrival here of the fishing boat Betsy and Ellen, in tow of the steam fishing boat Scotia, belonging to Mr R Irvin, fish salesman, who wired the news to the Harbour master. I went down to the Fish Quay this afternoon, and your telegram reached him while I was talking to him. At that time they had got the Betsy and Ellen righted and a large number of willing hands was busy bailing and pumping the water out of her. Thousands of people line the quay, including several of our most influential citizens. The utmost expedition was used to pump her out to see if they could find any of the ill-fated crew. About an hour after my arrival I was informed that they had found one body and shortly after I saw them remove the same to the police boat on a stretcher. He seemed an old man and was encased in oilskins. He had not long been removed when they found another body. This one, who I was told was rather decomposed had oilskin trousers on. He was also removed by the police boat to the dead house at the Low Lights, where they both now lie. I was with Mr Irwin when he wired you and got them to add that he was an old man. Then it was impossible to say whether any more bodies were on board, as they were still busy pumping, so I waited until they could make a proper search, and then wired you that no more bodies were on board, and that the boat was all right ,except that her masts were broken off, one of them floating alongside. The boat now lies at the Fish Quay, and several line are lying about on deck, as well as the baskets they are placed in when bailed. I presume that already some of the friends will be on their way here to identify the bodies at the inquest, which will be held as early as possible – I should think on Monday – and if I can be of any assistance to them in any way my services are at their command. I presume the river police will have the matter in hand, but during the evening I will see the chief constable, and if I can give you any further information will give you later. General expressions of sympathy and sorrow on all hands while they were removing the bodies, and as this is the second boat which has been towed in here within the last few days, bottom up, and having some of the bodies of the crew on board, it has caused great excitement. I was just on the point of writing you when I saw Mr Irwin, as I knew the great interest you take in the fishermen of Arbroath, and was very pleased to see your letter appealing for subscriptions for widows and orphans. Deeply sympathising with the sufferers from this melancholy disaster, and assuring you of any help that may be required by those who may have to journey here on such a sad errand.
Mr Greig and the fishermen who left Arbroath on Saturday evening arrived at North Shields on Sunday morning, and they, having visited the mortuary and seen the two bodies, Mr Greig telegraphed to Mr Bennet that they had identified them as James Carrie and Charles Swankie. Mr Carrie's body was easily identified by means of his watch, which was presented to him by the fisherman in consideration of the great interest he took in their cause in connection with the harbour provisional order about ten years ago. As we formerly mentioned, both men have left widows. Mr Carrie, one of the oldest fishermen in Arbroath, was 60 years of age; Mr Swankie, besides his widow, has left five children. Of the four other men nothing is known, except that doubtless they are all lost. They are David Carrie, about 40 years of age, son of James Carrie, who has left a widow and three children; Thomas Shepherd, about 35 and John Shepherd, about 30, sons-in-law of James Carrie, who leave widows but no children; and David Cargill, about 35 years of age, who leaves a widow and five children. It was doubtless on the night of the 31st of March, during the fearful storm which then prevailed , and probably soon after she was last seen, that the Betsy and Ellen was struck by a sea, and turned over. She was at that time about seventy or eighty miles from land.
--------------
THE INQUEST
On Monday morning, an inquest was held at the house of Mr James Wood, Low Lights Tavern, North Shields, before Mr J R D Lynn, coroner, on the bodies of the two fishermen found on board the fishing boat Betsy and Ellen, discovered in the North Sea by the crew of the screw line fishing boat Scotia, and towed into the Tyne on Saturday. The jury having viewed the bodies at the mortuary.
Robert Cargill, fisherman, Arbroath deposed that the bodies which the jury had seen were those of James Carrie 65 years of age, fisherman of Arbroath, and Charles Swankie, 44 years of age, fisherman of the same place, two of the crew of the fishing boat Betsy and Ellen of Arbroath. Witness did not now go to sea. On the 30th of March he was on the shore digging sand worms, when he saw the Betsy and Ellen putting to sea. He was so close to the boat that he could have spoken to the crew. It was about 4 o'clock in the afternoon. Both the deceased were on board the Betsy and Ellen, which was bound for the fishing ground. About one o'clock in the afternoon of the 31st ult, a storm arose, and several boats were for some time missing. Ultimately, all the boats with the exception of the Betsy and Ellen returned to Arbroath. The Betsy and Ellen was not heard of again until she was towed into the Tyne. In reply to a juryman, witness said that, in his opinion, the Betsy and Ellen had been on a port tack when struck by a sea, and the ballast being shifted to the starboard side, she fell upon her beam ends, and could not be righted. The Betsy and Ellen was a good boat, and one of the best in Arbroath, and belonged to a class of good sea boats. He did not remember another accident of this kind during his experience as a fisherman. The sail and one of the masts were gone. He could not say from the gear how the accident happened. The fishing ground was between 70 and 80 miles off the Bell Rock.


They took her in tow and brought her into the Tyne, landing her at the Corporation Fish Quay, North Shields. Witness assisted in righting the boat and pumping out water. The two bodies were found in the hold, among the lines &c. Both men had their oilskins on and one of them had his mittens on, as if they had been at work. In witness's opinion the boat had been taken aback and capsized by a squall of wind.
P.C. Geo. Thompson, of the river police, deposed that he was present when the bodies were found. He assisted in conveying the bodies to the mortuary, and he examined them. They were dressed in their oilskins &c. On the body of James Carrie he found the silver watch and chain produced and the 5s 5d in money, and on the body of Swankie a purse containing 2s 10d and a handkerchief. The bodies were very much decomposed. The watch found on Carrie bore the following inscription:- Presented by the fishermen of Arbroath to James Carrie as a token of respect, 5th January 1877. The watch had stopped at four o'clock.
Robert Cargill, in reply to the coroner said that Carrie was a man who was very much respected by the fishermen of Arbroath. He was a good fisherman and was looked up to and consulted on any difficulties that may arise.
The coroner said that there was no doubt but that the Betsy and Ellen had suffered the same fate as the Sisters, of Pittenweem, recently towed into the Tyne.
The jury returned the verdict to the effect that the deceased were found drowned on board the Betsy and Ellen, fishing boat, which had been caught in a squall and capsized while returning from fishing.

The Betsy and Ellen has been taken to the Albert Edward Dock. The coroner then handed the necessary certificates to the representatives of the deceased.

ARRIVAL OF THE BODIES IN ARBROATH

At the close of the inquest Mr Bennet received a telegram stating that the Arbroath fishermen had left North Shields by the 11 AM train on Monday forenoon, bringing with them the bodies of James Carrie and Charles Swankie. Having been informed of this, the fishermen of Arbroath assembled in the Coast Mission Hall about eight o'clock and walked in a body to the railway station, there to wait the arrival of the train conveying the bodies of the deceased. About 200 fishermen were present, and the streets were lined with spectators. On the arrival of the train the coffins containing the bodies were transferred to two hearses and the sad procession – the fishermen following the hearses – proceeded by way of West Port and Commerce Street to the mission hall where the coffins were laid out on tables. The fishermen in the procession were of all ages – from old men to boys. A short service was conducted in the chapel by Rev. Messrs Thompson and Cruickshank, assisted by Mr Craig, the East Coast Missionary. The men then vacated the building, and women were admitted, when a second service was held. Many of those present were greatly affected by the solemnity of the proceedings. Mr McNeill Superintendent of Police, was present during the removal of the bodies from the station to the hall and marshalled the procession.

THE FUNERAL

The funeral took place on Wednesday afternoon and was very impressive. A devotional service was held in the Old Church at a quarter past one o'clock and was largely attended by fishermen, their families and others, including the Kirk Session of Arbroath parish, of which body Mr Carrie was a member. The service was conducted by the Rev Mr Thomson, minister of the parish, and the Rev Mr Howat, minister of Park Street United Presbyterian congregation, of which congregation, Charles Swankie was a member. Park Street Church was well represented in the congregation which assembled in the Old Church on Wednesday. The Rev. Mr Morris, of the Free Church Colliston, the Rev Mr Christie minister of Auchmithie, and the Rev Mr Cruickshank, assistant minister, Arbroath, were also present. The service commenced with the singing of the 53rd paraphrase ('Take Comfort, Christians'). The other hymns sung were the 255th and 224th in the Scottish Hymnal (When our heads are bowed with woe' and 'Go bury thy sorrow'). The singing was accompanied on the organ. Each of the reverend gentlemen who conducted the service offered up prayer. The Scriptures read were the 90th Psalm 1 The? 1V , 13 to end, and Rev v1L 13 to end. The service was concluded with the benediction. At the close of the service in the church, the funeral procession was formed in the lower part of High Street, extending from the Coast Mission Hall to Danger Point. The two coffins were brought out of the hall, each of them covered with beautiful wreaths which had been sent by the Hon. Mr. And Mrs. Bruce of Seaton. There were two hearses, followed by a mourning coach with relatives, the members of the Kirk Session of Arbroath, and between two and three hundred fishermen of Arbroath, Auchmithie, Ferryden and Broughty Ferry. Many of the fishermen are members of the rocket brigade, and in that capacity the whole body were marshalled by Mr. Steele, Chief Coastguard Officer, Westhaven. A number of private gentlemen of the town and district also attended the funeral among whom were Provost Anderson, Mr James Johnston and Mr W D Johnston fishourers, Montrose, Mr Bennet, solicitor &c. The church bell was tolled during the funeral, the shops were closed and the flags in the shipping as, also the boats in the harbour were flying half – mast high. It rained heavily, but, notwithstanding, the whole line of procession from the Mission Hall to the Abbey was studded with spectators, who showed heartfelt sympathy with the sad ceremony which was taking place. The windows and outside stairs on the lower part of High Street were crowded chiefly with the wives and children of the fishermen of Arbroath, many of whom were deeply affected as the mournful procession passed by. James Carrie was interred in the Abbey Burying Ground and Charles Swankie was interred in the New Cemetery. At the close of the interment in the Abbey the funeral procession was reformed, and followed the body of Charles Swankie to the Cemetery. Thus the bodies of these two fine specimens of East Coast fishermen, after drifting about in the derelict boat for many days in the North Sea, were deposited by loving hands in kindly mother earth, there to repose with kindred dust.

This boat, Reaper, is similar to the Betsy & Ellen

Further reports of this tragedy:

Six men lost their lives on 31st March 1887 when the 'Betsy & Ellen' AH18 over-turned about 70 miles off-shore :-
  • James Carrie, age 65
  • Charles Swankie, age 44
  • David Carrie, age 39, son
  • Thomas Shepherd, age 38, son-in-law
  • John Shepherd, age 36, son-in-laws
  • David Cargill, age 33

Report from The Scotsman 4th April 1887



Report in the Shields News Transcription)

Dear Roy


I have found information about the Sisters in the April 1887 Shields News, but no sign of the
Betsy&Ellen around the same time.
"Sisters"
9th April 1887 - The Missing Fishing Boats "No tidings of the missing boats, Nellie Murray of Buckie,
and Sisters of Pittenweem have yet been received, although the whole coast and tide run has been
searched. All hope of their safety has now been abandoned."
12th April 1887 - A Capsized Vessel picked up off the Tyne "Last night one of the ill-fated fishing
vessels - the "Sisters" KJ221, belonging to Pittenweem - which were lost in the late storm was towed
into the Tyne, bottom up, by the Steam-tug Prince Consort of South Shields. The vessel has been
beached at South Shields. Nothing has been heard of the crew and there remains little doubt that
they perished in the storm."
13th April 1887 - The Capsized Fishing Boat in the Tyne, Discovery of 6 bodies - "As stated in our
yesterday morning's issue the trawler Prince Consort, of North Shields, towed into the Tyne the
fishing boat Sisters, of Kirkcaldy. The boat, which was picked up bottom upwards sixty miles off the
Tyne, an which left Kirkcaldy on the 13th March is supposed to have capsized in the late gale,
drowning her crew of 7 hands. The vessel was beached on the south side of the river and was
righted as the tide left her. An examination was made at midnight, when it transpired that at least 3
bodies were left on board. The fishing nets and tackle were an entangled mass and could not be got
free of the masts, and the sails were hanging by the side. On access being gained to the cabin,
three bodies were found. The bedding and other articles were thrown into confusion doubtless by
the capsizing of the boat and at first only one body could be seen and it was not till some time
afterwards that the others were discovered. It has not yet been definitely ascertained that these are
all on board. The bodies were taken charge of by the river police and removed to the mortuary. The
Sisters is a large vessel, such as usually carry 6 or 7 hands. She is marked K Y and belongs to
Pittenweem."
Further discovery of bodies - "The River Police continued their examination of the Scotch fishing boat
Sisters until and early hour this morning. After further pumping operations a strict search was made
in the cabin and three more bodies were discovered. This morning the whole of the bodies were
identified by the relatives of the unfortunate men. Their names are as follows:- David Jack (37)
married leaves a widow and 7 children; Geo Wilson (40) a widower leaves 3 children; William Hughes
(42) married leaves a widow and 9 children; William Finley (39) married leaves a widow and 6
children; James Galloway (24) leaves a widow and 2 children. It appears there were 7 hands on
board the ill-fated vessel, the missing body being that of Thomas Galloway (24) single. The Sisters
was owned by William Finley (Captain) and David Jack, both of whom perished in the gale. The
whole of the deceased men belonged to Pittenweem."
19th April 1887. The Pittenweem Fishing Boat Disaster. - "The bodies of the six men from the
Pittenweem fishing boat disaster the Sisters arrived by rail from Shields at Pittenweem on Friday
having been conveyed in a special van - the North Eastern and North British Railway Companies
kindly agreeing to carry the whole at the price chargeable for a single corpse. The funeral of the
deceased took place on Saturday afternoon in presence of over 2000 spectators. A meeting was held
on Saturday night at Pittenweem in connection with the accident. Provost Henderson presided. He
stated that they were met to consider what was to be done in aid of the sufferers. It appears that
there were six widows and 32 fatherless children who are in absolute need of immediate assistance.
A Committee was appointed to raise subscriptions. Mr Thomas Gilchrist, High Street Pittenweem
was appointed treasurer of the relief fund and will receive subscriptions."
I hope this transcription helps with your research. If I find anything about the Betsy & Ellen I shall let
you know.
Regards,
Diane Leggett
Librarian
Local Studies Centre

Since many of my friends and family on Spink Ancestors have been asking about the Pittenweem boat, The Sisters, I have included a message received from Local History Studies at the Museum of Northumberland regarding the Sisters.
During my visit to Arbroath in 2010 I took a run across to the kingdom and visited the Scottish Fisheries Museum in Anstruther and whilst there found a poem dedicated to the AH18 and the Pitenweem boat. The museum curator was kind enough to reproduce this for me and this is a scan of it:


The record of Charles' burial

Birth: 1843 in St. Vigeans

Death: 1887 North Sea


Note: Swankie, Charles buried on: 20 April 1887 recorded at: Arbroath Western (Angus) date of death 01 April 1887

Burial:
Arbroath
Angus, Scotland



The final tragedy in all of this is, on my recent visit to Arbroath, I visited the West Cemetery after finding in which grave Charles was interred, and found that he lies in an unmarked grave


Peter was only ten years old when his father was killed, and I can imagine his mother's anguish at being left with five young children, three of whom were boys and all raised in a fishing community. Their ancestors had all been fisherfolk. It is all there was in Auchmithie, fishing was their way of life, it was in their blood.

I can understand Margaret's fears, she had lost her husband and feared that her three sons would follow their traditions into fishing. She must have been very strong at convincing her sons to follow different paths because this is the reason that my grandfather and his brothers were never fishermen, their mother, after losing her husband, declared that none of her sons would ever go to sea.

It may seem odd that someone who has been working on the history of their family for twenty odd years has only just found all of this five years ago. What is even odder is that I spent quite a few holidays in Arbroath as a teenager yet knew nothing of who my great grandfather was or what happened to him. I knew his brother William when he was an old man and suffering from cancer, but never had the chance to ask him about family, just as I did not with my grandmother.

I realise that teenagers are about interested in family history as they are of cleaning their rooms and will never think to ask about their grandads and grandmas, but I would urge anyone reading any of my stories not to wait until they ask, but tell them. Spend a wet winters night in front of the fire (assuming you have one) and if you have old photos or anything relating to the family, talk to them about it. If they are not interested at the time, write it all down for them to peruse at leisure. They will soon start asking questions, I just hope you have the answers.

I have no children to whom I can tell my stories. I have no siblings to share them with, but I have cousins who do have children and grandchildren, and if these stories can be of benefit to them then I have not written them in vain.

My thanks to:

All my family close and distant on:


Scottish Fisheries Museum, Anstruther:


The Arbroath Herald:




21 August 2015

Marriage Confusion over William Scarbrough

WILLIAM SCARBROUGH



Concerning Thomas and Jane's eldest son, William, two parish records exist for a marriage, one to a Catherine Bacon in Newington St Mary in 1822

The Newington St Mary marriage


I have looked for the witnesses to this marriage and found that George Bacon was Catherine's brother. I have, to date found no record for Isabella Gregg.

The other to a Catherine Alexis in Liverpool in 1825.

The Liverpool marriage (Bishop's Transcript)

Lancashire, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1936
NameWilliam Scarborough
GenderMale
Event TypeMarriage
Event Date25 Apr 1825
ParishLiverpool, Lancashire
Register TypeBishop's Transcript
Household Members
NameAge
William Scarborough
Catharine Alexis

























The Liverpool marriage record states the groom's occupation as 'wine porter' thus some confusion ensued as to which bride was correct. Naturally I understood that the Newington marriage could be correct as it took place close to where William lived. All censuses stated his wife only as Catherine and that she was born in Southwark giving rise to the possibility that she was Catherine Bacon. Something niggled at me as any matches called up in ancestry hints from other trees, listed Catherine Bacon as his wife, so why was I, despite all of this evidence, convinced that everyone else was wrong and that, for some odd reason, the correct marriage was that to Catherine Alexis?

As I have said not all parish registers were uniform and some, as in the marriage in Liverpool, do not give witness information. Unfortunately these were prior to 1837 civil registration and as such no certificate can be obtained. Mostly they will not give names of parents either on marriages and sometimes just the father in births. Baptism records tend to be a bit better as they provide both parent names, in most cases.

To me there was only one way to prove this as I could find no record which mentioned his wife's name other than Catherine, since the marriage dates were 1822 & 1825 respectively, and prior to statutory registration, no marriage certificate was available, therefore, the only way I could think of to find the correct Catherine, was to find a birth record for one of the children. I chose the last child Jane, born 26 April 1852 in the registration district of St. Mary Magdalen, Bermondsey, sub district: Leather Market. Mother Catherine Scarbrough formerly Alexis. I was correct in doubting the given evidence and in heeding my own feeling that the obvious is not always correct. That in itself satisfied one curiosity, but led me to another, why were they married in Liverpool? Had he married Cath Bacon and run off with Cath Alexis, thus committing bigamy?
Had Cath Bacon died?
Is the marriage to Cath Bacon to another William Scarborough? I have, as yet found no evidence of a death or divorce for Catherine Bacon, but am still searching

Thomas' family were not the only ones to suffer tragedy. William's wife died in Guy's hospital after being horribly burned in a fire in the house. The details are below in the inquest on her death.



William's baptism record has bothered me for some time, and as I have said, I spent two and a bit years trying to find this through Ancestry. Something made me pick up an old connection to FindMyPast and on the off chance, I did a search for William's baptism. I could not believe my eyes, the first result was for William Scarbrough son to Thomas & Jane, St. Margaret, Westminster, Middlesex.

Westminster Baptisms Transcription
First name(s)
WILLIAM
Last name
SCARBOROUGH
Birth year
1804
Birth day
30
Birth month
May
Baptism year
1804
Baptism day
15
Baptism month
Jul
Parish
St Margaret, Westminster
Father's first name(s)
Thos
Mother's first name(s)
Jane
County
Middlesex
Page
215
Record set
Westminster Baptisms
Category
Birth, Marriage & Death (Parish Registers)
Subcategory
Births & baptisms
Collections from
United Kingdom